InvoiceGlass

Missing IGIC/IPSI tax identifier on the document-level charge · BR-IG-04

  • Severity · Error
  • Applies to · UBL / CII
  • Editorial review pending

A document-level charge uses the affected tax category (BT-102). The invoice then needs at least one of BT-31, BT-32 or BT-63. In CEN 1.3.17 this rule covers IGIC (code L) in UBL and IPSI (code M) in CII.

As of

Who can correct it?

The sender can correct the invoice.

How to fix it

  1. Add the seller’s actual VAT identifier or tax registration identifier, or the seller’s tax representative’s VAT identifier, in its corresponding field.
  2. XML fields in the affected group · UBL cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyTaxScheme/cbc:CompanyID or cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cac:PartyTaxScheme/cbc:CompanyID · CII ram:SellerTradeParty/ram:SpecifiedTaxRegistration/ram:ID (VA or FC) or ram:SellerTaxRepresentativeTradeParty/ram:SpecifiedTaxRegistration/ram:ID (VA)

Rule text and source

Paraphrase · If the affected tax category is used on the document-level charge, the invoice must contain a seller tax identifier or the seller’s tax representative’s VAT identifier.

Message to the sender

Subject: Invoice {invoiceNumber} – Missing IGIC/IPSI tax identifier on the document-level charge

Hello,

could you clarify a detail on your invoice {invoiceNumber} dated {issueDate} (BR-IG-04)? A document-level charge uses the affected tax category (BT-102). Add the seller’s actual VAT identifier or tax registration identifier, or the seller’s tax representative’s VAT identifier, in its corresponding field.

Could you send us the corrected invoice?

Thank you and kind regards

Example

A document-level charge uses the affected code but the invoice omits all three qualifying tax identifiers. Adding the seller’s actual VAT identifier supplies one of the required identifiers.

Related rules

Business terms

BG-21

Rule versions

CEN · EN 16931 1.3.17

Validate a file