The description of the third-party payment is missing · BR-DEX-12
- Severity · Error
- Applies to · UBL
- Editorial review pending
When an invoice under the XRechnung extension shows a third-party payment, each such payment must carry a description, for example what it is for and who is to receive it. This detail is missing, so the invoice is not valid.
As of
Who can correct it?
The sender can correct the invoice.
How to fix it
- Ask the sender for a corrected invoice in which every third-party payment states its type, amount and description.
Rule text and source
Paraphrase · Each third-party payment in a UBL PrepaidPayment block of the XRechnung extension requires a non-blank description in cbc:InstructionID.
Message to the sender
Subject: Invoice {invoiceNumber} – third-party payment description missing
Hello,
Thank you for your invoice {invoiceNumber} dated {issueDate}. When checking it we noticed that a third-party payment shown in the invoice is missing its description (rule BR-DEX-12). The invoice is not valid like this. Could you please send the invoice again with complete details?
Kind regardsExample
The third-party payment has a type and amount, but cbc:InstructionID contains only whitespace. The sender supplies an accurate description, such as “Mobile payment for services from provider A”.
Rule versions
KoSIT · XRechnung Schematron 2.6.0