Extra UBL field “Maximum number of payment instructions / Payment instructions › direct debit mandate” · UBL-CR-436
- Severity · Warning
- Applies to · UBL
- Editorial review pending
The CEN check flags the XML element cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric in UBL invoices and credit notes. It checks for maximum number of payment instructions under “payment instructions › direct debit mandate”.
As of
Who can correct it?
The invoicing software provider can correct the export.
How to fix it
- Find the entry in the UBL export at cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate/cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric.
- Adjust the export to omit cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric at this location. If you need the information, first check where the selected profile expects it.
Rule text and source
Paraphrase · The test reports a finding as soon as cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate/cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric returns at least one match.
Message to the sender
Hello,
rule UBL-CR-436 was triggered when checking electronic invoice {invoiceNumber}. The validator flagged maximum number of payment instructions under “payment instructions › direct debit mandate”. Could you check the export and send us a corrected file?
Kind regardsExample
The rule flags cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric under “payment instructions › direct debit mandate”. The corrected export omits that element from the affected section.
UBL
cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate/cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric
Fails the rule
<cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric>2</cbc:MaximumPaymentInstructionsNumeric>
Corrected
<!-- optional element omitted -->Rule versions
CEN · EN 16931 (KoSIT) 1.3.16
CEN · EN 16931 1.3.17