Extra UBL field “Building number / Delivery › delivery location › address” · UBL-CR-367
- Severity · Warning
- Applies to · UBL
- Editorial review pending
The CEN check flags the XML element cbc:BuildingNumber in UBL invoices and credit notes. It checks for building number under “delivery › delivery location › address”.
As of
Who can correct it?
The invoicing software provider can correct the export.
How to fix it
- Find the entry in the UBL export at cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryLocation/cac:Address/cbc:BuildingNumber.
- Adjust the export to omit cbc:BuildingNumber at this location. If you need the information, first check where the selected profile expects it.
Rule text and source
Paraphrase · The test reports a finding as soon as cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryLocation/cac:Address/cbc:BuildingNumber returns at least one match.
Message to the sender
Hello,
rule UBL-CR-367 was triggered when checking electronic invoice {invoiceNumber}. The validator flagged building number under “delivery › delivery location › address”. Could you check the export and send us a corrected file?
Kind regardsExample
The rule flags cbc:BuildingNumber under “delivery › delivery location › address”. The corrected export omits that element from the affected section.
UBL
cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryLocation/cac:Address/cbc:BuildingNumber
Fails the rule
<cbc:BuildingNumber>18</cbc:BuildingNumber>
Corrected
<!-- optional element omitted -->Rule versions
CEN · EN 16931 (KoSIT) 1.3.16
CEN · EN 16931 1.3.17