InvoiceGlass

The type of third-party payment is missing · BR-DEX-10

  • Severity · Error
  • Applies to · UBL
  • Editorial review pending

A third-party payment in a UBL invoice using the XRechnung extension requires a non-blank payment type in cbc:ID. This rule checks that the entry is present.

As of

Who can correct it?

The sender can correct the invoice.

How to fix it

  1. Ask the sender for a corrected invoice in which every third-party payment states its type, amount and description.

Rule text and source

Paraphrase · Every third-party payment in a UBL PrepaidPayment block of the XRechnung extension requires a non-blank ID describing the payment type.

Message to the sender

Subject: Invoice {invoiceNumber} – third-party payment details incomplete

Hello,

Thank you for your invoice {invoiceNumber} dated {issueDate}. When checking it we noticed that a third-party payment shown in the invoice is missing its payment type (rule BR-DEX-10). The invoice is not valid like this. Could you please send the invoice again with complete details?

Kind regards

Example

The third-party payment has an amount and description but no payment type. The sender adds the actual type in cbc:ID, for example MobilesBezahlen for a mobile payment.

Rule versions

KoSIT · XRechnung Schematron 2.6.0

Validate a file