InvoiceGlass

The XRechnung specification identifier differs · BR-DE-21

  • Severity · Warning
  • Applies to · UBL / CII
  • Editorial review pending

The identifier in BT-24 should be one of the defined XRechnung 3.0 identifiers. The check reports a warning if the XRechnung rules run on an invoice with a different identifier. The identifier also affects which validation scenario is selected.

As of

Who can correct it?

The sender can correct the invoice.

How to fix it

  1. Ask the sender to check the export profile selected in the invoicing software.
  2. For a standard XRechnung, choose the XRechnung 3.0 profile and export the invoice again.

Rule text and source

Paraphrase · BT-24 should use the defined identifier for XRechnung, its extension or the CVD variant.

Message to the sender

Subject: Invoice {invoiceNumber} – The XRechnung specification identifier differs

Hello,

Thank you for your invoice {invoiceNumber} dated {issueDate}. The file’s specification identifier differs from the expected XRechnung identifier (BR-DE-21). Please check the export profile and send the invoice again.

Kind regards

Example

The standard identifier is urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#compliant#urn:xeinkauf.de:kosit:xrechnung_3.0. It appears in cbc:CustomizationID (UBL) or in ram:ID inside ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter (CII).

Related rules

Business terms

Rule versions

KoSIT · XRechnung Schematron 2.6.0

Validate a file