The XRechnung specification identifier differs · BR-DE-21
- Severity · Warning
- Applies to · UBL / CII
- Editorial review pending
The identifier in BT-24 should be one of the defined XRechnung 3.0 identifiers. The check reports a warning if the XRechnung rules run on an invoice with a different identifier. The identifier also affects which validation scenario is selected.
As of
Who can correct it?
The sender can correct the invoice.
How to fix it
- Ask the sender to check the export profile selected in the invoicing software.
- For a standard XRechnung, choose the XRechnung 3.0 profile and export the invoice again.
Rule text and source
Paraphrase · BT-24 should use the defined identifier for XRechnung, its extension or the CVD variant.
Message to the sender
Subject: Invoice {invoiceNumber} – The XRechnung specification identifier differs
Hello,
Thank you for your invoice {invoiceNumber} dated {issueDate}. The file’s specification identifier differs from the expected XRechnung identifier (BR-DE-21). Please check the export profile and send the invoice again.
Kind regardsExample
The standard identifier is urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#compliant#urn:xeinkauf.de:kosit:xrechnung_3.0. It appears in cbc:CustomizationID (UBL) or in ram:ID inside ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter (CII).
Related rules
Business terms
Rule versions
KoSIT · XRechnung Schematron 2.6.0